The issue which I have seen, in talking with several people working with M. boeleni, is that they all utilize the typical "snake breeder" type setup. Usually vision cages, limited space, limited resources, limited environmental conditions, etc.. These are big snakes, which would use every inch of space(vertical space too) that you give them(but yet we restrict them to tiny cages??).
While it seems that many python and other snake species can be bred in great numbers under the 'minimalist' approach; that being tiny cages, little variability, etc.. , (such as ball pythons, retics, boas, etc..); perhaps M. boeleni is not as tolerant to neglectful/incomplete husbandry as many of these other species...
Space is always big concern when keeping herps, and can get expensive. I am surprised to see that nobody has experimented with offering HUGE spaces to accomodate these animals- I'm talking about room sized enclosures which offer an enormous amount of hiding areas, areas of varying humidity/dampness levels, various different basking spots, temperature gradients, and usable surface area...Much like many of us approach monitor-keeping.
I think that going back towards using the variables and conditions that they have evolved to use in nature would be a good approach to take, as this minimalistic, unnatural approach has apparently gotten nobody anywhere... 20oz water bowl, newspaper substrate, a single basking spot, a single hide 'box', 18" of vertical height, 18sq feet of usable surface area...
I think that these snakes not only deserve more, but I also feel that perhaps if somebody keeping these animals were to step outside the common approach and train of thought regarding python breeding(vision cages, newspaper, etc.), and offer some variation to their environment, maybe people would start seeing success with this species... Why stray further and further away from nature?? I guess that's what I'm getting at....
-----
Treemonitors.com