Ray,

You either

(A) haven't read the manuscript, or

(B) read it but totally failed to understand it.

Since the paper is not yet published, I will confine myself to saying that the core of the paper is based on extensive mtDNA sequence data (real sequence data, not wishful thinking data like in your various species descriptions). Like all scientific conclusions, ours are subject to challenge with new evidence. If you want to challenge our conclusions, then go out and get some REAL data - that would make a refreshing change.

Have a nice day,

WW
-----
WW Home