Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click here to visit Classifieds
Click for ZooMed
Click here for Dragon Serpents

Hybrid Possibility Info Please......

REPTILE4U Jul 21, 2007 02:16 PM

I need any info on breeding White Line Geckos. My Female White Line is gravid by my Male Crested. This was not on purpose, someone gave me a White Line and I didn't have anywhere to put her, so I put her in with my Crested Colony considering there is plenty of room and as long as they got along. She has been in there over a year, and has just now started showing the white patch belly indicating she is gravid. So if these eggs are even successfully laid, I need to know anything I can to help them along. I know what I need to know about Cresteds, but I am sure the White Lines are different.

Any help PLEASE......Thanks in advance.

Replies (29)

ginebig Jul 21, 2007 05:55 PM

I'm far from expert on this, but you'll ned to wait till the eggs are layed to determine if they're fertile first. The chance of that happening between two totally unrelated species is very slim. Not impossible, but unlikely. As far as incubating them, once fertility is determined, I'd check online for caresheets of them both and figure a temp from there to start with. Sorry I can't be more help.

Quig
-----
Don't interupt me when I'm talkin' to myself

REPTILE4U Jul 21, 2007 06:56 PM

Thank you for your info. I looked for caresheets, but it seems that there are not many for them. I don't expect them to be fertile.

AndrewFromSoCal Jul 21, 2007 09:10 PM

If they're fertile, you should totally kull the eggs. We play God enough as it is, creating a whole new species is a little unnecessary.

REPTILE4U Jul 21, 2007 09:59 PM

So I assume you believe in abortion too?? B/c that is exactly what you are suggesting. I'm sorry, but an accidental breeding is not the offspring's fault. If they were deformed and what not it would be a different story. I would not choose for them to suffer. But if you had read the original post carefully, you would have read that I am not trying to "play God". This was simply just not something that was expected at all to happen. So if the eggs are fertile, i will attempt to hatch them.

Not to sound mean and all, but to many people like you always say something like this...."you should totally kull(I assume you meant kill) the eggs." So who is truly the person with the cruel intentions here??

Either way, I am not trying to start a fight nor an argument with this response, I am merely defending my opinion on this, just as you vocalized yours.

Thanks

nile_keepr Jul 26, 2007 03:11 AM

"So I assume you believe in abortion too?? B/c that is exactly what you are suggesting. I'm sorry, but an accidental breeding is not the offspring's fault."

Abortion is one thing; as with humans, people do it for completely different reasons (because the parents are unfit, because the child was a result of something 'bad', etc.) which tend to have more to do with the emotional state of the child throughout its life, and the ability of its parents to raise it properly.

As such, this situation has nothing to do with said topic. Reptiles are not raised by their parents, and are not subject to emotional trauma as a result of not having a secure parent figure.

That person (though poorly stated) was stating that its not good to do whats taking place here- be it on purpose or 'by accident'. And personally, I think thats BS. You could easily house a white line in its own enclosure; and after a year you SHOULD have given it its own enclosure. Im not going to try to figure out your reasoning, because it could be something as innocent as not wanting to buy a new cage, to something as sneaky as wanting this whole thing to happen in the first place and just coming on here saying you didnt.

There are a number of risks in creating a hybrid. In terms of scientific views, the paramount risk is diluting the gene pool over time- something you may not think would happen; but it IS possible if your new creations survived and others attempted what you had.

From a moral standpoint, I dont think anyone with half a brain can disagree that messing with 'life' on such a basic level is something man kind should aspire to avoid. In this case, you can say 'who is it going to hurt?' and, chances are, the answer is 'Nobody." But just because you arent causing something phsyical harm, dosnt mean its RIGHT to do what youre doing. As a human, you should be happy with what nature provided; rather than trying to 'improve' upon it. I realize that you could say 'well, nature provided these eggs; im not trying to improve upon nature, im just trying to keep them alive."

But the truth is, nature DIDNT provide these eggs- they are the result of a horny male lizard taking advantage of a female of another species to quench his testosterone-driven libido; something that would not/could not have occured unless you had made it occur (by forcing them into contact and not allowing the white lined a mode of overall escape).

Basically, its rape. And for the record, YES, i DO agree with abortion if the child is the result of a rape. (while I realize that much of reptile mating could be seen as rape from this perspective; i see interspecies mating as a different matter, as likely the female knows that something isnt right with the situation, but cannot do anything due to being overpowered by said horny male- ive handled both adult male crestys and adult white lined, and there would be no problem for a large male cresty to overpower and mate with a female white line)

Snuffing out a few eggs removes the risk of gene-pool dilution. And a question here. You say
'If they were deformed and what not it would be a different story. I would not choose for them to suffer.'

And I ask you, how do you propose to know they are deformed before they hatch? Because they are already suffering long before that, if that IS the case. And what do you propose to do if they ARE deformed? THEN you dont have a problem killing them? Just so long as YOU got the chance to see if they MIGHT make something different?

Seems like you are doing this more becasue you wanna see what will come of it, rather than because you dont feel comfortable simply destroying the eggs, seperating the animals, and moving on.

Man's interference in natures design has become steadily more and more commonplace- from the hybridization of pet animals, to the manipulation of genetic material to benefit man.

Just because it happens, dosnt make it right.

nile_keepr Jul 26, 2007 03:12 AM

Just like to note here, Im not trying to start an arguement.

But this is something I feel strongly about, both as a person and as a conservationist; and as such, feel a need to state my opinion here.

AndrewFromSoCal Jul 26, 2007 08:01 PM

You worded it better than I possibly could. Thanks.

nile_keepr Jul 27, 2007 12:27 AM

My pleasure

ztous Jul 26, 2007 08:33 PM

"Man's interference in natures design has become steadily more and more commonplace- from the hybridization of pet animals, to the manipulation of genetic material to benefit man."

Mans interference in nature is what truely defines man. From wearing clothes to adapt to diffrent enviorment, making cars to go faster, all the way to breeding new animals.

nile_keepr Jul 26, 2007 09:38 PM

"Mans interference in nature is what truely defines man. From wearing clothes to adapt to diffrent enviorment, making cars to go faster, all the way to breeding new animals."

If thats your viewpoint, I cant really argue with you over it- its your perspective, and I cant even begin to guess how you came to such a conclusion.

Simply put: Just because man chooses to do something to make his life better, dosnt mean that its the right thing to do on a larger scale.

Narcissistic as we are, humans think that because we have the capacity to do something means that we are 'meant' to do it, or that we SHOULD. In our history as a species, we've only just recently started looking at the large scale consequences of our actions, and have started taking steps to prevent bad consequences from occuring. Many though, seem content to just say 'well, im a human, I have thumbs, im better than everything else; so why not do what I want?' And that basically comes down to "should I do it? Considering theres really NOTHING to gain in said circumstance, no, you should not. Could I do it? Yes, you probably could.... Ok, im gonna do it."...And if thats your outlook, well, no offense; but youre the problem with humanity as things are- theyd prefer to bury themselves in this blanket of ego; as opposed to accepting that the way theyve treated other living things since, well, the beginning of time, has been pretty primitive; and attempting to alter them accordingly. (im not saying you personally see things that way, but people that do ARE the problem)

And anyway, if you can logically compare wearing a shirt in order to survive in a colder environment; with confining mixed species in hopes of creating a hybrid.... well, im sorry, but that just dosnt sound logical to me. One is a requirement for survival; while another is simply something one does out of preference.

Many of mans actions are of this sort, and we simply prefer to group them all together. You cannot compare making a car go faster (still a luxury; but one that has at least a somewhat logical purpose) with keeping 2 species of animals confined together in hopes that the hormones of the males will get them reved up enough to essentially rape another animal( a luxury that has a far greater chance of injuring one/both of the animals, causing at least one of the animals mental distress, resulting in mutated/deformed babies or diluting the gene pool even; than it does of producing healthy, living offspring that will survive their lives successfully).

At least, not the way I see things.

nile_keepr Jul 26, 2007 09:41 PM

And again, I dont know for certain the reasoning of this keeper, and as such cant comment directly on their situation.

REPTILE4U Jul 26, 2007 10:02 PM

You know the reasoning, as I stated in my original post, I had no need to remove the White Line as they were getting along. Many keepers and Authors of Crested books keep other species that aren't related with Cresteds. But you had to go assuming, and we all know what that does. Only reason I haven't commented sooner, I don't feel that people who call me asinine without any aggression or name calling on my part really deserve my time. Nile, you however, you atleast made this statement:

"Just like to note here, Im not trying to start an arguement.

But this is something I feel strongly about, both as a person and as a conservationist; and as such, feel a need to state my opinion here."

No problem, we all have our opinions. But I do feel that you guys have been fairly rude, aggressive, and have assumed way to much. And I don't really feel as though I should have to defend myself to a post as simple as the one I put up. I didn't ask for opinions on making hybrids, b/c as I stated, "It was purely accidental." But you said this:

" Im not going to try to figure out your reasoning, because it could be something as innocent as not wanting to buy a new cage, to something as sneaky as wanting this whole thing to happen in the first place and just coming on here saying you didnt. "

I mean, you make it sound like this is some conspiracy. I am not a child and I don't have any reason for lying, so before you go assuming, make sure you have the right type of person.

One more argument I would like to defend:

"Basically, its rape. And for the record, YES, i DO agree with abortion if the child is the result of a rape. (while I realize that much of reptile mating could be seen as rape from this perspective; i see interspecies mating as a different matter, as likely the female knows that something isnt right with the situation, but cannot do anything due to being overpowered by said horny male- ive handled both adult male crestys and adult white lined, and there would be no problem for a large male cresty to overpower and mate with a female white line) "

Ok, first, your opinion, and you are entitled to it. But before you make that comment, did you think about the fact that the majority of Reptile breeding that takes place has a male pinning down and overpowering the female?? Kingsnakes, *CRESTEDS*, Leopard Geckos, Beardeds sometime. Atleast make your arguments make sense.

One last thing, sorry if this irritates you nile, I just felt as though I should defend myself to these assumptions. If you don't agree with it, I understand that, but next time to give someone your opinions, even though you feel strongly about them, you don't have to be abrasive about it. Sorry we had to meet on these terms.

nile_keepr Jul 27, 2007 12:16 AM

"One last thing, sorry if this irritates you nile, I just felt as though I should defend myself to these assumptions. If you don't agree with it, I understand that, but next time to give someone your opinions, even though you feel strongly about them, you don't have to be abrasive about it. Sorry we had to meet on these terms."

I am not; on the contrary, Im glad to meet keepers. Im sorry you took things so negatively.

" Im not going to try to figure out your reasoning, because it could be something as innocent as not wanting to buy a new cage, to something as sneaky as wanting this whole thing to happen in the first place and just coming on here saying you didnt. "

I mean, you make it sound like this is some conspiracy. I am not a child and I don't have any reason for lying, so before you go assuming, make sure you have the right type of person."

Now, im sorry, but you could EASILY have decided to come on this forum, claiming this was an accidental occurence in an attempt to avoid people getting too angry over the subject. As such, Im trying my best NOT to get angry over this- this is something I feel VERY strongly about; on the verge of this almost being what i would think of as a 'religious' matter. This is something that, as far as Im concerned, should have been avoided in the first place; and the fact that you come on asking for information about how to care for these hybrids makes me wonder further about your intentions... Im not assuming anything; but I take all things in this world with a pinch of salt.

Basically, what REALLY made me wonder was the fact that you said the animals had been housed together for about a year... why? You have a colony of crested geckos, yet dont respect that white line enough to give it a private, stress free environment? A year is a LONG time to just have a creature 'in between cages'; especially something like a white lined, which could easily be housed in a relatively small enclosure (as enclosures go). I mean, you do realize that, because of the way reptiles sexual organs are designed, it may well be possible for interspecies mating to damage one or both of the individuals, yes? That alone should have been enough to remove that animal; as what was happening to it was A. no doubt causing it undue strees, and B. could cause physical harm to it, and perhaps the male to boot.

"Only reason I haven't commented sooner, I don't feel that people who call me asinine without any aggression or name calling on my part really deserve my time."

If I made you think I was calling you outright assinine, well, didnt mean to. But I WOULD consider that slightly irresponsible- that animal should have been seperated a long time ago.

"But I do feel that you guys have been fairly rude, aggressive, and have assumed way to much. And I don't really feel as though I should have to defend myself to a post as simple as the one I put up."

Defending yourself and providing an explanation are different things, and perhaps you should try not to take things quite so confrontationally. I really wasnt trying to be mean to you or anything like that, but you placed a post regarding a hybridized animal- something that is looked down upon highly in most circles. You should have expected at least a somewhat negative reaction. Now granted, perhaps things were miscommunicated, and you took it as a personal attack- it wasnt (at least not from me).

I was simply stating my views on some of the things you had said regarding why you think its ok not to simply throw these eggs out now, and avoid all the risk inherent in trying to incubate them. Something Id still like answered-
how do you propose to know they are deformed before they hatch? Because they are already suffering long before that, if that IS the case. And what do you propose to do if they ARE deformed? THEN you dont have a problem killing them? Just so long as YOU got the chance to see if they MIGHT make something different?

"I didn't ask for opinions on making hybrids, b/c as I stated, "It was purely accidental."

Something people dont seem to realize- this is the internet; not a search engine. You post something here, its out there for everyone to see and respond to. You cant simply expect that only the people who think what you want, or have something positive to say about what you are doing, are going to respond. You have to expect people to respond, especially when you are talking about something that many people look down upon 100% (myself included).

Whether you did this accidentally is irrelevent. Rather than seperating the animals and moving on, having learned that you shouldnt house species together like that; you have chosen to attempt to hatch these eggs. This means that you have now chosen to take things to the next step. It no longer matters whether you did it on purpose or not- its there, and you are furthering it. The same results can occur in both scenarios, so it dosnt really matter at this point whether you initially wanted to have this happen or not.

"Basically, its rape. And for the record, YES, i DO agree with abortion if the child is the result of a rape. (while I realize that much of reptile mating could be seen as rape from this perspective; i see interspecies mating as a different matter, as likely the female knows that something isnt right with the situation, but cannot do anything due to being overpowered by said horny male- ive handled both adult male crestys and adult white lined, and there would be no problem for a large male cresty to overpower and mate with a female white line) "

Ok, first, your opinion, and you are entitled to it. But before you make that comment, did you think about the fact that the majority of Reptile breeding that takes place has a male pinning down and overpowering the female?? Kingsnakes, *CRESTEDS*, Leopard Geckos, Beardeds sometime. Atleast make your arguments make sense."

While I realize that much of reptile mating could be seen as rape from this perspective; i see interspecies mating as a different matter, as likely the female knows that something isnt right with the situation, but cannot do anything due to being overpowered by said horny male- ive handled both adult male crestys and adult white lined, and there would be no problem for a large male cresty to overpower and mate with a female white line.

What i mean by that is, in nature, a female white lined would have the oppurtunity to escape an aggressive male of another species- but due to being confined, that option was removed. Wherever that gecko ran, that male likely followed; until the white lined was worn down to a point of being easily catchable.

Ive watched my pictus mate, and while it can seem rough at times, the females often appear to be 'allowing' it to happen- they could scurry off around their cages, male attached; or fight/struggle violently... but they dont. They sit and they take it. Ive seen the same thing with anoles. When I introduced a male bahama anole, he attempted to mate a couple times with the female green. As a result, I removed the female and gave it to a friend; because I would often hear the female struggling to get away from the bahama- something she didnt do with the other green anole males. I would assume that white lined likely did the same when that cresty got ahold of her; and depending on size, she just might have been able to struggle enough to break free and scurry off.... or at least, she could in nature. In the cage though, she may do that a number of times before she simply does not have the phsyical strength left to fight off the advances of this foreign male.

Geckos arent THAT stupid- most can see in some level of color (including ultraviolet), and use visual keys to discern species- that white lined likely had no doubt that this was NOT a male with which she was supposed to be mating, according the instinctual 'rules' nature has implanted in its brain, and put up at least SOME effort to avoid what was going to happen- she has every reason to, as it could cause her physical harm in more ways than one.

The end result is, a female being forced into mating against her will, which would also be known as 'rape'; and while much of reptile mating appears to be 'against the will' of the female, I dont think it really is- as they dont seem to struggle nearly as much with a male of their own species as they do with a male of another species. And thats my reasoning behing that statement- just to reclarify things.

I believe that arguement makes, at very least, SOME sense. If its beyond your understanding (and i dont mean that insultingly, maybe just that i didnt explain it well enough), I cant really do anything more to explain it; nor do I really care to.

You dont SEEM to be looking to do anything shifty- if what you say if true, then you are just a keeper who had a freak 'accident' occur. But, whereas I would feed those eggs to another animal, or simply crack them and put them outside for the ants, in an attempt to avoid the 'nastier' results that could come about (deformed/mutated babies, healthy babies that in turn could lead to dilution of the gene pool [and while you may SAY you wouldnt sell them or anything; i find it HIGHLY unlikely that, if they looked cool and you were getting high price offers for them, that you wouldnt at least CONSIDER selling a few off], etc.) you have chosen instead to take the next step in trying to bring these creatures into the world- despite the fact that it can really result in nothing truly positive. Thats irresponsible in my opinion... but hey, thats only my opinion.

As of the moment, I dont see this as an arguement- Im doing my best to be civil, and I think youve done the same. We are simply discussing something as people who share a common hobby. Try not to take things so personally- understand that none of these views has a thing to do with YOU; but more to do with what you are planning to DO.

REPTILE4U Jul 27, 2007 12:29 AM

First off, thanks for your maturity in this reply. Second, I am very tired, and about to go to bed, so I feel my reply tonight would sound somewhat dumb.....lol. I will make a more rested reply in the morning. One last thing though, the asinine remark wasen't meant for you, but AndrewFromSoCal is the one who made the remark, sorry if I mislead.

Thanks again for your patience with these last posts.

nile_keepr Jul 27, 2007 12:38 AM

Hehe, but of course.

Im glad to see someone on KS not losing their head over someone having a slightly different viewpoint.

nile_keepr Jul 27, 2007 12:37 AM

And granted, I dont have enough experience to back some of the things Ive witnessed as common occurances.

All I really need to know in this situation is:
-somehow you have obtained eggs of a crestedxwhite line genetic makeup

-you have chosen to try to hatch these eggs when they are laid; despite that fact that them being unfertile is about the best possible outcome.

-you are trying to explain yourself by saying you dont want to kill the eggs because you dont feel comfortable with it, yet are more than willing to allow these possibly deformed/infertile/mutated babies into the world; where theres a chance they could wreak serious havoc if they ever managed to get into the "gene pool"

If im wrong on something here, please correct me. Because, from what I see there, I cant honestly agree with what your doing; no matter the circumstances. Theres really no REASON for it, and it could cause a number of problems (which Id like to note, none of which actually affect YOU, as much as they do the animals [both parent and offspring] and the natural way of things).

Again, we are not agrueing- we are simply having a friendly discussion... a debate, if you must make it a competition. Personally, Id prefer to just think of it as 2 people interacting on a friendly level and sharing their views on things.

I mean, would I like to see you just give up on those eggs? Sure I would. Do I expect it to happen? Psh, not likely.

But I can try, right? :D

REPTILE4U Jul 27, 2007 12:43 AM

LMAO......Not at you, but nice reply. But once again, tired, lol. Will repsond tomorrow, o, and thanks for you responce to the last post I made, now you are correct, this is a friendly discussion, atleast between me and you.

Thanks again.

Serious bedtime now.

ztous Jul 27, 2007 04:57 PM

You see, your picking in choosing what is right and wrong and hideing behind the "morality" arguement. I could directly extrapolate that your a natzi from your previous statements.

NOW I am NOT calling you a nazi simply stating that they had the exact same idea of a pure gene pool and simply changed there morals slighty for it too be right and not wrong.

nile_keepr Jul 28, 2007 05:12 PM

"You see, your picking in choosing what is right and wrong and hideing behind the "morality" arguement. I could directly extrapolate that your a natzi from your previous statements.

NOW I am NOT calling you a nazi simply stating that they had the exact same idea of a pure gene pool and simply changed there morals slighty for it too be right and not wrong."

The nazis, when it comes right down to it, did what they did because they believed themselves to be a superior race. They believed, if you were not of the physical makeup that they were, you were inherently 'inferior'.

Theres nothing inferior about those eggs/offspring- infact, who knows, they could well be far superior to either parent species. The simple fact is, this isnt a discussion as to whether or not one species is "superior" to another or not- this is a discussion as to can this have a serious effect on the population as a whole, or have a seriously negative effect on one of the individual animals involved (be it the offspring or either parent).

The Nazi's believed in a pure genepool of their own design because they believed their genes to be 'better' than that of others.

I believe in a pure genepool because thats what nature has intended- if it werent so, there would not be any special perameters around mating and everyone/thing could/would just screw everyone/thing and we would have minotaurs and griffons and all that sort of stuff. But that isnt reality. The reality is that most species genes do not intermingle corerctly- and the result is often mutated, deformed, or infertile babies/eggs.

Nature intends for species to stay within their own ranks- but sometimes man uses a loophole to allow such a thing to take place (usually by confining an aggressive male of one species, with a timid female of another).

Sometimes natures own plan backfires against it, and for whatever reason, 2 alternate species are confined to an area and begin interbreeding- typically, this is due to some form of geographic confining agent (a mountain range, a massive valley, islands, etc).

However, if this WERE to occur in nature, it would likely be because of the fact that these individuals of both species had been CONFINED; and as such did not likely have access to mate with the majority of the population, thusly keeping their alterned genetic makeup confined to the same area as the individuals themselves.

I really dont think you can compare a group of people claiming another group of people (same species) are genetically inferior based on minor physical attributes; to a person saying they dont want to risk diluting the gene pool of an entire species by mixing it with another species, simply for the pleasure that person will recieve in finding out if they will or will not hatch.

If the Nazis had a problem with a group of people because they were attempting to make love to horses or sheep in order to make a hybrid, yeah, I could see how such a comparison would be made.

As such, it has little bearing on the conversation; aside from attempting to insight an arguement.

The only even slightly useful comparison there is the whole dilution of the genepool.

The Nazis believed something like that could happen, and wished to protect their 'superior' 'pure' bloodline- a narcissistic outlook to say the least.

I believe something like that could happen with a captive population of reptiles; especially if said hybrids WERE 'visually' superior to their parents- if this were the case, they could easily become something people are interested in creating themselves, and suddenly the population of these hybridized animals is booming. Suddenly, its becoming more and more difficult to find a straight cresty or a straight white lined, as people have so thoroughly interbred them that no 'pure' genetic line still exitsts within the captive lines- which means people will increase their demand for wild caught specimens of both species (ie, those still maintaining the 100% cresty/white lined genetic code).

Simply an example: wild scottish cats (a wild species of cat native to scotland, duh) are dying out. One of the main causes of this, is interbreeding with domesticated cats.

Now, while this DOES produce offspring all the same, this offspring is not 100% of either- it is a hybrid of both, and as such, may have genetic abnormalities that might not appear til later on in its life. The chances of this animals offsprings (if it is capable of having offspring) bearing some sort of deficiency is even higher than that of the oringal hybrid.

Another:
"Haldane's rule is one of the most widely applicable paradigms in evolutionary biology, stating that in species crossings, the heterogametic sex will suffer more severely in terms of sterility and inviability. We address this in a within-species outbreeding situation by assessing the risk of producing inviable offspring depending on the sex ratio of the clutch produced in between-population crossings in the laboratory. In crossings between male and female sand lizards (Lacerta agilis) from two different sampling regions, one in Sweden, one in central Europe, risk of gametic incompatibility is unaffected by outbreeding, but offspring from between-population crossings show 300% higher malformation frequency and 10% lower hatching success. The risk of having inviable offspring increases with the production of daughters, i.e. the hemizygous sex in this species (ZW). Such sex-specific genetic costs of offspring production need to be incorporated into life history ecology, e.g. sex allocation theory."

300% higher malformation frequency; and thats within a same-species, different population breeding group.

(taken from: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00652.x?cookieSet=1&journalCode=ele)

Basically, what it comes down to is- this isnt a matter of believing one animal genetically or phsyically superior to the other. This is a matter of man mucking with nature and creating something nature had never intended to exist. As such, you cannot begin to fathom what variety of negatives could come about through these sort of cross breedings- we dont know enough about genetics really, to claim to know 100% for certain that something truly bad couldnt come of the situation (creation of a creature with an extremely 'negative' aspect [extremely prolific breeder; or carrier of some genetic mishap that creates a new strain of reptile born sickness]).

And when it comes right down to it, who ends up losing the most in all these circumstances? Not man, because he really couldnt care less about things to begin with.

The animals are the ones who suffer, because its them that will have a much higher deformity rate, a much higher infertility rate, and a much higher risk of some sort of genetic disorder making its way into their bloodline.

The Nazis did what they did, and believed what they did, because they were narcissistic apes reaching out for a way to make themselves feel bigger and better than what they are.

Im here talking to this person because I honestly believe that it could have a detrimental effect on these creatures- be it through a genetic disorder that springs into existence, be it through the pain and suffereing of deformed babies, be it through the pain and suffering of an animal that knows whats taking place to it is instinctually not what it should be doing but cannot stop it; or be it through the eventual dilution of the bloodlines (which can lead to all sorts of negative things; paramount of which in my mind is the increased strain on wild populations as people decide they want a 100% cresty, and not that one that MIGHT have white lined genes in it).

nile_keepr Jul 28, 2007 05:28 PM

Dennis, from Norther Virginia Reptile Rescue says it better than I think I can:

"As a large reptile rehabilitation and rescue organization, we often receive letters from potential guardians concerning the restrictions against breeding and reselling of companion animals, or how we feel about the mass import and sale of wild caught herps. Allow me to take a few moments to address those comments....

....We see your breeding mistakes that end up as "cheapo" animals at the reptile trade shows: the kinked-spine snakes from improper incubation; the non feeding lizard and toad eaters; the scaleless, eyeless, colorless animals you think you can profit from if only you "tweak" them a bit more here and there. Or the Sunday afternoon half-price specials so you can go home with fewer animals.

No, we don't worry too much about how you keep your animals - except for perhaps the multitudes of shoeboxes where the animals have no enrichment or exercise and are nothing more than breeding machines. We do, however, worry about the hundreds of animals that you sell to your customers with only profit as your motive and greed as your guide."

adamjeffery Jul 28, 2007 10:21 PM

"The reality is that most species genes do not intermingle corerctly- and the result is often mutated, deformed, or infertile babies/eggs. "

i really hate jumping into a debate that no one can win but if you read other forums you would find this info to be inaccurate. most of the time if offspring are hatched from a hybrid breeding then they are comletely fine most of the time. but when you breed "pure" (a.k.a. limited gene pool) lines consistently ie inbreeding,linebreeding is when you can get mutations and deformaties at higher than normal levels
-----
hybrid breeders association
1.1 sinacorns
1.1 kenyan sand boas
1.1 mbk
1.1 albino corns
1.3 ghost corns
1.0 ball python het axanthic
1.0 snow corns
1.0 jurassic milk
0.1 bloodred
0.1 striped albino corn
0.1 childrens python
0.1 albino nelsons
0.1 anery motley
0.1 albino banded cal king
0.1 normal corn het hypo,anery
0.1 hypo tang hondo

nile_keepr Jul 29, 2007 04:36 AM

"...but if you read other forums you would find this info to be inaccurate. most of the time if offspring are hatched from a hybrid breeding then they are comletely fine most of the time. but when you breed "pure" (a.k.a. limited gene pool) lines consistently ie inbreeding,linebreeding is when you can get mutations and deformaties at higher than normal levels"

Now, this interests me abit.

Granted, Im going off the fact that you said "if you read other forums".

I would theorize (and this is only theory mind you) that the reason you dont see alot of deformed babies as a result of hybridization, while seeing more from linebreeding-inbreeding, is 2 fold:

1. hybridization being looked down upon in many circles, people may not be as willing to share their failures (deformed hybrid hatchlings) as they are their successes (healthy babies); because they feel it may attach some negative stigma to them. even if the community in question DOES look highly upon hybridization, few people share their failures in this sense

2. basically the other side of 1; being that most people who are doing something more commonly accepted will be less likely to fear sharing failures with the community- as what they are doing to begin with is not something likely to cause disdain from the community

I could well be wrong on that, and probably am.

Night.

otis07 Jul 29, 2007 10:16 AM

dude, you totally just took the words out of my mouth, but put them much more gracefully than i would have

otis07 Jul 29, 2007 10:15 AM

this applies a lot in animal farm by george orwell. for those who haven't read it i highly suggest it.

otis07 Jul 29, 2007 10:13 AM

so ur saying that killing is the best option, that you're killing the baby, not because you don't want to take care of it, but because it is for the good of the baby?

i have a lot of opinions about abortion, but i still don't know what i beleive yet. i think it could go either way, but i think you still have to have good reasoning.

Just_Ders Sep 10, 2007 05:01 PM

Well if you own a house, and drive a car, you should burn them both, because you're polluting the environment, and supporting habitat loss.

What if the hybrid cures cancer? What if the rape baby cures cancer?

How would you know if it was deformed? What if they're all deformed and this one comes out the way they're supposed to look like? I do not believe it says in the Bible that we shouldn't try to mate two different animals together in captivity. Even Christ rode on and conversed with a mule. I dishonering the ten commandments are the only thing that would qualify you for "playing God." Killing is one of those things.

My name is Ders, and I'll be here all night.

Ingo Jul 23, 2007 01:53 PM

Nothing will hatch, do not worry. Afaik these species even have different chromosome numbers. So no chance for hybridization.

Ci@o

Ingo

otis07 Jul 29, 2007 10:19 AM

this is a really good thread, i didn't read all of it, but there is some good stuff!

Herptophile Sep 25, 2007 04:47 PM

I think its a great idea, i would love to see the offspring, neat stuff!!! Keep it up man, i hope they hatch for you! good job strengthening the gene pool! without cross species breeding there wouldnt be evolutionary leaps!

Thanks
-----
To you im just the crazy snake guy, but to some I'm a 'Herper'.

Site Tools