Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for ZooMed
Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You

Least deadly Vipers

DKing38 Aug 08, 2011 07:29 PM

I'm not asking this because i want to get some hots but i was just curious which vipers are the least leathal toward humans. I've read a little about such snakes as Tropidolaemus wagleri and the Atropoides family but what other vipers are not as leathal mainly due to weaker venom but also attitude, bite effectiveness etc.

Replies (2)

Viktor Sep 28, 2011 04:28 AM

It's been a while since your post, but I hope you're still interested. I mostly know about pit-vipers, so I'll stick to that (mostly). The thing that first got me thinking about this is Raymond L. Ditmars anecdote about an Eyelash Viper in a banana shipment. Basically the main points of the story are A) An Eyelash Viper (could have been a related species?)comes in in a banana shipment from South America. B) The importer gives the snake to his daughter as a pet/specimen. C) (and this is where my memory gets fuzzy, I'll have to find the text again) The importer and his daughter bring the snake to Ditmars (possibly for I.D.? Maybe it wasn't eating?) D) Ditmars acquires the snake after informing the importer of it's potentially dangerous nature. Is this story entirely true? I doubt it, but it could certainly be based on fact. Probably a lot longer than I needed to make it, but I hope I am getting my point across. Many species of arboreal vipers cannot inject or produce significant amounts of venom (at least for a viper), and are fairly mild mannered, however, they may co habitat closely with humans, or occupy disturbed habitat (farms, plantations, etc.). You also mentioned the Atropoides complex. As far as I know, they are only responsible for several (possibly as many as 20) human fatalities each year. Part of this is their extremely sedentary lifestyle. Another factor is their comparatively (to other related pit-vipers) non-virulent venom. I have not had opportunity to analyze their defensive strike, but you are probably aware of their feeding strike. To put it simply, they hit prey quickly with great power and don't let go. This could mean that they require time to work their venom into a human (or other predator). I'm sure someone more learned and experienced than I will be able to answer this. As far as Old-World Vipers, Habu would appear to be fairly innocuous serpents. They have a fairly mildly-virulent venom, although I cannot attest to the nature of their tempe

Viktor Sep 28, 2011 04:30 AM

temperament. They are widely used in traditional asian medicine, and are therefore widely collected. They are often collected and displayed in a fashion many western hot keepers would deem careless and dangerous. Denagkistrodon are among the most common vipers available in Chinas animal markets. Many deem this to be among the most dangerous of asian vipers, and yet it is displayed in wire crates and sold for as little as 200 RMB (27 USD). But I digress, in Africa there are many comparatively non-threatening vipers. Among which I would include, often to the scoffs of others, the Puff Adder. For you see, although this serpent envenomates many humans each year effects are often mostly localized, and mortality is (relatively) low. However, there are many less dangerous vipers occupying the continent. I have probably rambled on much more than you were looking for, but this is a topic I feel worthy of lighthearted discussion, if only for the sake of theory.

Site Tools