Reptile & Amphibian Forums

Welcome to kingsnake.com's message board system. Here you may share and discuss information with others about your favorite reptile and amphibian related topics such as care and feeding, caging requirements, permits and licenses, and more. Launched in 1997, the kingsnake.com message board system is one of the oldest and largest systems on the internet.

Click for 65% off Shipping with Reptiles 2 You
Click for ZooMed
Click here to visit Classifieds
thefiradragon Mar 05, 2005 01:15 PM

hello, i'm writing a paper about keeping exotic pets and are explaining both sides for an ethics paper.i know that many rettiles with the proper care make really great pets. i would l;ike to use an example for the other side that is against keeping them.

which reptile has the poorest track record in captivity both for the general pubic and zoos.

which one has the leaste known about it, as in feeding reqs, tempretures, breeding, etc.

thanxs lot
-----
"I’m scared of those nasty big-eyed grey aliens, too. I think it’s that I don’t understand their motivations. I am confident of my ability to out-think, out-con, or if need be, tire-iron-upside-the-head demonic forces, ghosts and goblins, things that go bump in the night, etc. It’s the notion of something that doesn’t have any desire to talk to me except via anal probe that freaks me out"

Replies (1)

joeysgreen Aug 29, 2005 05:27 AM

This changes all the time. An animal is a poor captive simply because we have a poor understanding of what environmental needs are important to it. As the leaders working with a particular species learn about what works and what doesn't, this information eventually becomes readily available.

I would refrain from the word pet, as a lot of good captives are not kept for pets, but for other reasons. In fact they would make terrible "pets". Venomous snakes are a prime example.

Ian

Site Tools