![]() | mobile - desktop |
|
![]() |
![]() Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ]
[ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] [ Reply To This Message ] [ Register to Post ] |
Posted by: justinian2120 at Wed Sep 20 07:24:03 2006 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by justinian2120 ] right,no debating those facts....btw in my previous post i did get a couple facts wrong,the mtdna was concerning canebrakes from fla. compared to a northerly state which escapes me at the moment;and the south jersey ones were most closely related to the north jersey montane ones.....but my point in general was that if you're gonna sink atricaudatus into h. horridus,then how the hell can you justify all those other n.a. snake subsp.?....you can't,obviously.snake taxonomy is very inconsistent the way it stands currently. [ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ] | ||
>> Next Message: RE: Timber vs. Canebrake - wildtropics, Wed Sep 20 08:15:12 2006 >> Next Message: RE: Timber vs. Canebrake - wulf, Wed Sep 20 08:53:01 2006 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: Timber vs. Canebrake - wildtropics, Tue Sep 19 22:06:35 2006 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|