Posted by:
loveNwar
at Wed Feb 3 11:27:04 2010 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by loveNwar ]
I could be talking garbage here (i'm don't even live in the USA) but i feel the need to ask: What real, extensive (and undertaken by credited scientists) study on natural impact was done over Florida to backup the python ban? If such document exists, was it ever made public, explicit and coherent? Where's the actual list of species that got endangered after the released of pythons? Where's proof that pythons originated such threat? Credit names of bioligists that sign under such claims and make themselves responsible for their authenticity! Furthermore, if pythons are already breeding in the wild, what difference is a pet python ban gonna make now? And a last question: if some polititians are irresponsible, should we punnish them all? (because that's how low they are treating herpers).
[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]
|