Posted by:
Ameron
at Fri Oct 18 15:29:27 2013 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Ameron ]
I understand the rationale behind “regional” naming schemes, and identifying former subspecies as merely variations of a known, variable species. (In general, there are too many naming schemes for plants & animals; many “subspecies” are merely variations of a species highly variable in appearance - like many snakes.
Here is the big “however”,
Based on my 25 years researching reptiles, I feel that enough difference exists between subspecies of North American Rat snakes to recognize them as individual species. Yellows have distinct traits not usually duplicated by other; same with Everglades; most especially of Black, Gray & Texas snakes.
I vote for keeping subspecies status, with unique names, when traits are distinguishable:
Pantherophis obsoletus obsoletus Pantherophis obsoletus spiloides Pantherophis lindheimeri Pantherophis quadrivittus Pantherophis spiloides Pantherophis slowinski Pantherophis emoryi
Ameron Portland/Vancouver
1.0 Elaphe schrencki (Anerythristic) 1.0 Pantherophis guttatus (Miami phase)
[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]
|