While my normal winter observation areas are natural, with hogs unless I discover some unique areas, I would have to build something and that would be interference, but I may if given permission.

Back to the peer reviewed question, my bet is theres a lot of work done and published on wintering sites. Even some with cameras, if I remember correctly or was told correctly, some of the original camera work was done back east on timbers. So please, go have a look, see what you can find.



As it is, I have done my own work and have been on other field studies where winter activity was reported. So its not new to me.



Lastly peer reviewed is limited by tools and direction of study. And of course, money. Theres is lots and lots and lots of ACTUAL real data that has escaped those information areas. My bet is, there will be more added each and every year, all stuff not in there now. The harsh reality is, cutting edge research is always ahead of data bases, peered reviewed or not.

Of real interest is how Mtdna methods were discovered. Look it up.

CONTEXT, this is a discussion board and any and all information here, has nothing to do with peer reviewed or not. I have lots of storied on the areas between peer reviewed and discovery if your interested.

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]