Posted by:
mequinn
at Sun Oct 3 11:01:51 2004 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by mequinn ]
HAHAHAHAHHA -
That is a darn good example of what I was talking about Bloodbat - how do the hobbyists keep it strait in their heads?
'You can call them anything they want' as the hobbyists say; they just do not wish to follow the 'scientific' level of it all, and make up their own...and they say the same about us! This is going nowhere fast...one name game is according to the mighty dollar, the other to what they look like, inside and out.
Which do you pick? Hmmmm....
Cheers Bloodbat,
markb
[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
- "Taxonomy" for Hobbyists - tomas, Sat Oct 2 19:22:13 2004
- RE: "Taxonomy" for Hobbyists - N_E, Sat Oct 2 20:06:51 2004
- umm, you forgot to mention that some taxonomists don't recognize ssp. n/p - EJ, Sat Oct 2 23:08:51 2004
- subspecies and time.... - mequinn, Sun Oct 3 01:10:32 2004
- RE: "Taxonomy" for Hobbyists - bloodbat, Sun Oct 3 08:35:22 2004
 RE: "Taxonomy" for Hobbyists = beautiful examples Bloodbat - mequinn, Sun Oct 3 11:01:51 2004 - hahaha - vcreations, Sun Oct 3 11:20:45 2004
- RE: "Taxonomy" for Hobbyists - FR, Sun Oct 3 11:35:13 2004
- RE: lets not confuse two methods of naming - JPsShadow, Sun Oct 3 15:53:03 2004
- Discussion moved: Monitors forum - phwyvern, Tue Oct 5 12:43:13 2004
|
.jpg "Click to visit PACNWRS")
