![]() | mobile - desktop |
![]() |
|
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Venomous Reptiles ] |
Posted by: TOM_CRUTCHFIELD at Sun Nov 16 14:17:48 2008 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by TOM_CRUTCHFIELD ] First I know pretty much everyone posting on this other than C. Hurd although we talked the othe day and I invited him to the farm and he said he's coming. Dan sent me pics the night it was killed and asked me if I thought it was a t-positive albino and I said it might be. After all the term t-postive is used now days so loosely who's to say its not plus I didn't see it in person. I agree with Chuck on most things he said about the naming of morphs. This whole hypo, hyper, t-positive thing has gotten out of hand. One thing is for sure it's a very different looking baby Cottonmouth and its a darn shame it was killed. I don't understand the need to squabble over a unique, albiet, dead snake.....TC | ||
>> Next Message: RE: The science of morphs, or lack there of - chuckhurd, Sun Nov 16 14:52:08 2008 | ||
<< Previous Message: The science of morphs, or lack there of - chuckhurd, Sun Nov 16 13:19:27 2008 | ||
|
|
|
|