Posted by:
WW
at Thu Nov 27 16:16:32 2008 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by WW ]
>>How does morphological evidence places Death Adders in Elapidae? >> >>How do you know genetics evidence will place Death Adders in Elapidae if you do not compare it with anything else but Elapidae?
As per the analogy in the previous post. If Acanthophis were anything other than an elapid, that would pretty rapidly become obvious in phylogenetic analyses, as Acanthophis would then obstinately fail to group within the elapids. It's not exactly a subtle nuance.
See some of the following:
Greer, A. 1997. The Biology and Evolution of Australian Snakes. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Sydney.
Heise, P.J., Maxson, L.R., Dowling, H.G., Hedges, S.B., 1995. Higher level snake phylogeny inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences of 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 259–265.
Kelly, C.M.R., Barker, N.P., Villet, M.H., 2003. Phylogenetics of advanced snakes (Caenophidia) based on four mitochondrial genes. Syst. Biol. 52, 439–459.
Keogh, J.S., Shine, R. & Donnellan, S. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of terrestrial Australo-Papuan elapid snakes (Subfamily Hydrophiinae) based on cytochrome b and 16S rRNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10: 67–81.
Lawson, R., Slowinski, J.B., Crother, B.I., Brubrink, F.T., 2005. Phylogeny of the Colubroidea (Serpentes): new evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37, 581–601.
Mengden, G.A. 1985. Australian elapid phylogeny: a summary of the chromosomal and electrophoretic data. In: The Biology of Australasian Frogs and Reptiles (G. Grigg, R. Shine & H. Ehmann, eds), pp. 185–192. Royal Zoological Society of NSW, Sydney.
K. L. SANDERS, M. S. Y. LEE, R. LEYS, R. FOSTER* & J. SCOTT KEOGH (2008) Molecular phylogeny and divergence dates for Australasian elapids and sea snakes (hydrophiinae): evidence from seven genes for rapid evolutionary radiations. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Scanlon, J.D. & Lee, M.S.Y. 2004. Phylogeny of Australasian venomous snakes (Colubroidea, Elapidae, Hydrophiinae) based on phenotypic and molecular evidence. Zool. Scr. 33: 335–366.
Schwaner, T.D., Baverstock, P.R., Dessauer, H.C. & Mengden, G.A. 1985. Immunological evidence for the phylogenetic relationships of Australian elapid snakes. In: The Biology of Australasian Frogs and Reptiles (G. Grigg, R. Shine & H. Ehmann, eds), pp. 177–184. Royal Zoological Society of NSW, Sydney.
Slowinski, J.B. & Keogh, J.S. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of elapid snakes based on cytochrome b mtDNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 15: 157–164.
Vidal, N., Delmas, A.-S., David, P., Cruaud, C., Couloux, A., Hedges, S.B., 2007. The phylogeny and classification of caenophidian snakes inferred from seven nuclear protein-coding genes. CR Biol. 330, 182–187.
Wallach, V. 1985. A cladistic analysis of the terrestrial Australian Elapidae. In: The Biology of Australasian Frogs and Reptiles (G. Grigg, R. Shine & H. Ehmann, eds), pp. 223–253. Royal Zoological Society of NSW, Sydney.
----- WW Home
[ Show Entire Thread ]
|