The recent research by Krysko did confirm a lot of what hobbyists had already observed as far as the phenotypes produced by this form, and expanded upon that by helping to define range, intergrade zones, etc.

But I was actually responding to this statement:

"The original scientists did most of the work and these guys dotted the eyes and crossed the T's and hijacked the name!!"

It doesn't sound like you've even read the paper. Here you go:

http://www.cnah.org/pdf_files/524.pdf

[ Show Entire Thread ]