I haven’t read the paper, but it is disrespectful in my opinion to invalidate what was done by Wilfed Neil and his naming the “Goini”. He preceded anybody else no matter how many specimens he did or did not examine and was first to write it up. I would accept if further study invalidated his findings and that the consensus was there was no such thing to warrant the special name. But this work seems to give further evidence (validate) that he was right. So why rename it? BS.

[ Show Entire Thread ]