Posted by:
herphobbyist
at Tue Apr 12 13:34:11 2005 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by herphobbyist ]
I learned math a long time ago. Lets do this the simple way. From a 4 egg clutch you'd (theoretically) get 1 albino 2 100% hets and a normal. I'm sure we can all agree on that? Unless you have a crystal ball you HAVE to call them 66% possible hets. From some of the newbie questions I seen the way it was explained in correct but confusing since thats not what they will be sold as. So to represent the hatchlings correctly you would call them 66% possible het. That is the point I was making. Ron ----- The Crawl Space
[ Hide Replies ]
- can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - jimfmcdonald, Mon Apr 11 22:42:24 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - ginebig, Mon Apr 11 22:47:16 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - jimfmcdonald, Mon Apr 11 22:55:18 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - BallPython13, Mon Apr 11 23:16:04 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - jasonkaline, Mon Apr 11 23:17:34 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - jimfmcdonald, Mon Apr 11 23:22:27 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - BallPython13, Mon Apr 11 23:26:16 2005
- Scott.. correction - herphobbyist, Tue Apr 12 00:24:39 2005
- What you are missing is..... - rodmalm, Tue Apr 12 02:54:52 2005
- if they are both co-dom then why not? thanks. SORRY - NEWReptiles, Tue Apr 12 02:58:59 2005
- RE: Scott.. correction - sjs, Tue Apr 12 04:15:57 2005
- sjs... - herphobbyist, Tue Apr 12 08:57:42 2005
- RE: What you are missing is..... - oddballpythons, Tue Apr 12 09:11:45 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - CJBianco, Tue Apr 12 10:16:06 2005
- RE: sjs... - rwoodyer, Tue Apr 12 10:18:31 2005
- Correction: What you are missing is..... - rwoodyer, Tue Apr 12 10:21:41 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - BallPython13, Tue Apr 12 10:58:25 2005
yes I do understand - herphobbyist, Tue Apr 12 13:34:11 2005
- RE: Correction: What you are missing is..... - oddballpythons, Tue Apr 12 15:23:53 2005
- RE: Correction: What you are missing is..... - rwoodyer, Tue Apr 12 15:42:00 2005
- RE: Correction: What you are missing is..... - oddballpythons, Tue Apr 12 16:14:44 2005
- RE: yes I do understand - CJBianco, Tue Apr 12 17:02:07 2005
- RE: to answer the origional question ............. - jyohe, Tue Apr 12 18:03:03 2005
- RE: Correction: What you are missing is..... - rwoodyer, Tue Apr 12 23:03:38 2005
- Exactly! - RandyRemington, Wed Apr 13 08:20:16 2005
- RE: I agree... - CJBianco, Wed Apr 13 08:57:00 2005
|