Posted by:
CJBianco
at Wed Apr 13 08:57:00 2005 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by CJBianco ]
The reptile community (among others) is learning genetics the hard way...and in an almost incomprehenible way. Instead of trying to grasp three separate genetic concepts from three different genetic traits (co-dom, dominant, and simple recessive), it is much easier to learn a single concept that applies to all genetic traits.
Maybe someone should build a website...
Chris =/ ----- “Next time don't buy $10K worth of snakes out of the back of a van!” -- Toshamc
[ Hide Replies ]
- can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - jimfmcdonald, Mon Apr 11 22:42:24 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - ginebig, Mon Apr 11 22:47:16 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - jimfmcdonald, Mon Apr 11 22:55:18 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - BallPython13, Mon Apr 11 23:16:04 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - jasonkaline, Mon Apr 11 23:17:34 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - jimfmcdonald, Mon Apr 11 23:22:27 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - BallPython13, Mon Apr 11 23:26:16 2005
- Scott.. correction - herphobbyist, Tue Apr 12 00:24:39 2005
- What you are missing is..... - rodmalm, Tue Apr 12 02:54:52 2005
- if they are both co-dom then why not? thanks. SORRY - NEWReptiles, Tue Apr 12 02:58:59 2005
- RE: Scott.. correction - sjs, Tue Apr 12 04:15:57 2005
- sjs... - herphobbyist, Tue Apr 12 08:57:42 2005
- RE: What you are missing is..... - oddballpythons, Tue Apr 12 09:11:45 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - CJBianco, Tue Apr 12 10:16:06 2005
- RE: sjs... - rwoodyer, Tue Apr 12 10:18:31 2005
- Correction: What you are missing is..... - rwoodyer, Tue Apr 12 10:21:41 2005
- RE: can a normal to normal produce a pastel ? - BallPython13, Tue Apr 12 10:58:25 2005
- yes I do understand - herphobbyist, Tue Apr 12 13:34:11 2005
- RE: Correction: What you are missing is..... - oddballpythons, Tue Apr 12 15:23:53 2005
- RE: Correction: What you are missing is..... - rwoodyer, Tue Apr 12 15:42:00 2005
- RE: Correction: What you are missing is..... - oddballpythons, Tue Apr 12 16:14:44 2005
- RE: yes I do understand - CJBianco, Tue Apr 12 17:02:07 2005
- RE: to answer the origional question ............. - jyohe, Tue Apr 12 18:03:03 2005
- RE: Correction: What you are missing is..... - rwoodyer, Tue Apr 12 23:03:38 2005
- Exactly! - RandyRemington, Wed Apr 13 08:20:16 2005
RE: I agree... - CJBianco, Wed Apr 13 08:57:00 2005
|