Posted by:
rwoodyer
at Fri Apr 15 01:06:39 2005 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by rwoodyer ]
I guess my point was that it is not a misapplication of genetics or the Punnet square or even Mendelian genetics (which by the way, he actually fixed all of his data to be more perfect, if anyone remebers Mendel and his pea plants). It is a misapplication of math and probability to try to determine the outcome of one event based on a 50% chance, the more events, the more applicable probability becomes.
[ Hide Replies ]
|