mobile - desktop |
Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ]
[ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Photography Forum ] [ Reply To This Message ] [ Register to Post ] |
Posted by: WK at Wed Mar 7 08:01:44 2007 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by WK ] I don't disagree with Chris. As I mentioned, long macros require you to be far from an animal if you are trying to take a picture of more than just a little part of its body. The 90-105mm focal length lenses are more useful for general herp photography. However, I definitely feel the longer macros give an advantage whe shooting skittish animals (like the anole posted above) because you don't have to approach them as closely. [ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: Disadvantages to zoom lenses? - MonarchzMan1, Tue Mar 6 20:51:12 2007 << Previous topic: I finally pulled the trigger on a dSLR - EmberBall, Thu Mar 1 19:12:33 2007 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|