![]() | mobile - desktop |
|
![]() |
![]() 3 months for $50.00 |
News & Events:
|
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ]
[ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] [ Reply To This Message ] [ Register to Post ] |
Posted by: apeltes at Wed Oct 1 21:38:14 2008 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by apeltes ] I would say the point is that paraphyletic taxa preserve mistakes and traditions. Paraphyletic taxa only make sense if people wish to base phylogeny on subjective perceptions. For example: many can accept a taxon made up of species with bony shells, hollow venomous fangs, rattles, hemipenes, and heat-sensing facial pits... but not fur or feathers. [ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: Atractaspis - Mark_in_SE_Wisc, Tue Sep 16 23:39:29 2008 << Previous topic: The genus Lampropeltis - CKing, Wed Jun 11 01:59:07 2008 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|