RE: Question for Mike Rochford,

Posted by: TOM_CRUTCHFIELD at Mon Feb 15 21:26:54 2010 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by TOM_CRUTCHFIELD ]

MIKE I CAN'T THINK OF EVEN ONE GOOD REASON NOT TO SIMPLY STATE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SNAKES DEAD AND ALIVE. No one is going to steal your data and write a paper. This is the ONE THING that really bothers me. Alright playing the devils advocate don't tell us numbers just tell us percentages. What percent of the studied Pythons died? No actual numbers just the percentage...
-----
Tom Crutchfield
www.tomcrutchfield.com

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]

Question for Mike Rochford, - Greg Graziani, Sat Feb 13 16:27:43 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - Mike_Rochford, Sat Feb 13 21:51:29 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - Lia, Sun Feb 14 08:38:33 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - Greg Graziani, Sun Feb 14 09:54:34 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - Jaykis, Sun Feb 14 10:01:19 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - Upscale, Sun Feb 14 11:21:22 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - Jaykis, Mon Feb 15 10:58:01 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - natsamjosh, Mon Feb 15 18:02:51 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - Mike_Rochford, Mon Feb 15 21:16:12 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Mon Feb 15 21:26:54 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - Mike_Rochford, Mon Feb 15 21:31:08 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - Mike_Rochford, Mon Feb 15 21:35:25 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - natsamjosh, Mon Feb 15 22:10:51 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - Mike_Rochford, Mon Feb 15 22:30:04 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - jscrick, Mon Feb 15 22:47:18 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - Mike_Rochford, Mon Feb 15 22:53:14 2010

RE: Question for Mike Rochford, - spmoberl, Mon Feb 15 22:57:36 2010

Looming question regarding publication - Jonathan_Brady, Tue Feb 16 06:43:33 2010

Credibility? - natsamjosh, Mon Feb 15 19:35:27 2010

RE: Credibility? - Mike_Rochford, Mon Feb 15 19:37:51 2010

RE: Credibility? - natsamjosh, Mon Feb 15 19:45:46 2010

RE: Credibility? - Mike_Rochford, Mon Feb 15 19:48:51 2010

RE: Credibility? - natsamjosh, Mon Feb 15 19:58:59 2010

RE: Credibility? - Mike_Rochford, Mon Feb 15 20:07:00 2010

And... - Mike_Rochford, Mon Feb 15 20:15:08 2010

Found at least one of them - natsamjosh, Mon Feb 15 19:54:11 2010

RE: Found at least one of them - Mike_Rochford, Mon Feb 15 20:11:18 2010

RE: Credibility? - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Mon Feb 15 20:54:43 2010

RE: Credibility? - natsamjosh, Mon Feb 15 21:22:25 2010

RE: Credibility? - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Mon Feb 15 21:30:16 2010

RE: Credibility? - natsamjosh, Tue Feb 16 08:06:56 2010

RE: Credibility? - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Tue Feb 16 08:32:10 2010

RE: Credibility? - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Tue Feb 16 08:38:29 2010

>> Next topic: 3, more positive news stories - Jonathan_Brady, Sun Feb 14 08:21:28 2010
<< Previous topic: Lets change the subject for a bit - bishopm1, Fri Feb 12 18:16:03 2010