I would rather get the peer reviewed scientific journal material. For better or worse, at least we will be dealing with more factual info. less subject to an interpretational sway of a small group.

I can guarantee it will eliminate far flung shi* like I read in the USGS report. Being a scientist myself, I could spot that the report was created by gov. employees (probably serving someones agenda) to get a pay check, and not people with sound scientific interest. Mike, I get the feeling you know that a government ID card doesn`t qualify someone as a creditable source of logic--please never repeat the USGS mistake. I can only hope their report was out of ignorance, at least that way I could forgive a mistake.
-----
steve

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ]