Posted by:
lep1pic1
at Thu Mar 25 17:00:10 2010 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by lep1pic1 ]
There has been a bit of lumping taking the subspecies out of the picture only giving them the distinction of a local form.This is the story mdna and dna.Many will always see a cainbreak as a cainbreak and not a timber.With an area where exotic out number the nominate species the everglades offer a wide range for study I would think.That alone makes the area unique and valuable as a living laboratory and tourist attraction.If we could embrace our own mistakes and exploit the new ecosystem there will be a day balance will be achieved .The replaced system is working on many levels as it is now.As we remove species the balance changes and population explosions will occur from one species to another.The fact is the sea of grass is no longer.The replaced habitat is close but not the same.The burmese python could be scene as the success of the new system and exploited as such instead of the blackball species.It is only one of many invaders.The cash price on the elimination of one could be followed by the crash of another.My views mean nothing but I think millions will be spent first before reality sets in. ----- Archie Bottoms
[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
- 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Upscale, Tue Mar 23 21:08:38 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - brd, Tue Mar 23 21:22:56 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - lep1pic1, Tue Mar 23 22:27:49 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - spmoberl, Wed Mar 24 00:05:58 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - DanielsDen, Wed Mar 24 08:13:40 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Upscale, Wed Mar 24 08:59:11 2010

- 60% Survival rate?? - steelersdiehard, Wed Mar 24 09:08:42 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Mike_Rochford, Wed Mar 24 09:28:58 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Upscale, Wed Mar 24 09:31:50 2010

- Certain;y not... - jscrick, Wed Mar 24 09:44:53 2010

- certainly possible... - jscrick, Wed Mar 24 09:52:03 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - steelersdiehard, Wed Mar 24 10:26:39 2010

- RE: certainly possible... - mavericksdad, Wed Mar 24 10:32:37 2010

- RE: show me the bodies - Calparsoni, Wed Mar 24 10:44:03 2010

- DO NOT APPOLOGIZE - brd, Wed Mar 24 11:07:01 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - tropicherper, Wed Mar 24 12:45:26 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - lep1pic1, Wed Mar 24 13:51:19 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - cychluraguy, Wed Mar 24 14:31:38 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Mike_Rochford, Wed Mar 24 15:01:04 2010

- Thank you. - Mike_Rochford, Wed Mar 24 15:09:18 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Mike_Rochford, Wed Mar 24 15:32:44 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - cychluraguy, Wed Mar 24 16:02:47 2010

- RE: DO NOT APPOLOGIZE - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Wed Mar 24 16:09:51 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - WSTREPS, Wed Mar 24 16:21:19 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Wed Mar 24 16:34:13 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Upscale, Wed Mar 24 16:56:56 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - lep1pic1, Wed Mar 24 17:02:09 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - Mike_Rochford, Wed Mar 24 17:07:14 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - varanid, Wed Mar 24 17:18:03 2010

- Thanks Mike and Frank - steelersdiehard, Wed Mar 24 17:44:36 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - lep1pic1, Wed Mar 24 19:08:03 2010

- RE: 9 out of 10 tracked pythons died - jscrick, Wed Mar 24 20:39:09 2010

- Busterlyme disease???? - Calparsoni, Wed Mar 24 20:53:51 2010

- RE: certainly possible... - thecrocpot, Thu Mar 25 04:59:51 2010

- RE: certainly possible... - jscrick, Thu Mar 25 08:51:11 2010

- Introduced species... - Ravenspirit, Thu Mar 25 09:44:33 2010

- RE: Introduced species... - cychluraguy, Thu Mar 25 11:09:17 2010

- RE: Introduced species... - brd, Thu Mar 25 12:12:17 2010

- RE: Introduced species... - cychluraguy, Thu Mar 25 12:19:59 2010

- RE: Introduced species... - brd, Thu Mar 25 12:25:59 2010

- RE: Introduced species.. TOM And MIKE - cychluraguy, Thu Mar 25 12:26:58 2010

- RE: Introduced species... - cychluraguy, Thu Mar 25 12:31:53 2010

- RE: Introduced species.. TOM And MIKE - Mike_Rochford, Thu Mar 25 13:40:35 2010

- RE: Introduced species.. TOM And MIKE - BRhaco, Thu Mar 25 14:20:24 2010

RE: Introduced species.. TOM And MIKE - lep1pic1, Thu Mar 25 17:00:10 2010 
- RE: Introduced species.. TOM And MIKE - cychluraguy, Thu Mar 25 18:10:50 2010

- RE: Introduced species.. TOM And MIKE - Ravenspirit, Thu Mar 25 22:47:59 2010

- Raccoons on Key Biscayne - Jaykis, Fri Mar 26 19:41:07 2010

- RE: Raccoons on Key Biscayne - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Fri Mar 26 20:53:08 2010

- RE: Raccoons on Key Biscayne - Calparsoni, Sat Mar 27 00:10:53 2010

- RE: Raccoons on Key Biscayne - TOM_CRUTCHFIELD, Sun Mar 28 11:12:15 2010

- RE: Raccoons on Key Biscayne - kachunga, Tue Mar 30 14:26:46 2010

- RE: Raccoons on Key Biscayne - jscrick, Tue Mar 30 21:10:13 2010

- RE: Raccoons on Key Biscayne - Calparsoni, Tue Mar 30 22:32:13 2010

|