You acknowedge the attacking of your opposition saying it (I paraphrase) doesn't matter they weren't negotiating in good faith anyway.

You acknowledge poor results. You have to. Two cool species are banned.

Yet you fail to reason that the poor results may be due to the clown that is attacking the opposition.

Forest/trees.

Isn't it possible that the poor results are due to your fearless leader attacking opposition at every opportunity and them not taking HIM seriously? If you answer know to this you are not being pragmatic. Why should any bureaucrat speak to him seriously. No matter what happens, and specially if he gets his way, he will denigrate them. That being the case, they might as well get something juicy in return.

Imagine the feather in their cap when they take retics and boas off the table.

Just remember, one definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing over and over again all the while expecting different results. The results never change. Something gets taken away, fearless leader claims "victory, donate more money", then sometime later screams "the sky is falling, we need more money, donate now, we take paypal..." and the donations aren't even tax deductible.

Why throw any of your hard earned money into the rathole that is USARK? Why put a penny into his pocket and his weekend tryst fund that he calls "the trade show fund"? Ever notice that at every show, he has some hot babe "volunteering", suppose she covers her own expenses?

To continue to do so is (by the definition provided above) insane.

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]