return to main index

  mobile - desktop
follow us on facebook follow us on twitter follow us on YouTube link to us on LinkedIn
International Reptile Conservation Foundation  
click here for Rodent Pro
This Space Available
3 months for $50.00
Locate a business by name: click to list your business
search the classifieds. buy an account
events by zip code list an event
Search the forums             Search in:
News & Events: Herp Photo of the Day: Bullsnake . . . . . . . . . .  Herp Photo of the Day: Mangrove Snake . . . . . . . . . .  Greater Cincinnati Herp Society Meeting - Feb 05, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Calusa Herp Society Meeting - Feb 06, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  St. Louis Herpetological Society - Feb 09, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Kentucky Reptile Expo - Feb. 15, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Colorado Herp Society Meeting - Feb 15, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Chicago Herpetological Society Meeting - Feb 16, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  San Diego Herp Society Meeting - Feb 18, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Suncoast Herp Society Meeting - Feb 22, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  DFW Herp Society Meeting - Feb 22, 2025 . . . . . . . . . .  Bay Area Herpetological Society Meeting - Feb 28, 2025 . . . . . . . . . . 
Join USARK - Fight for your rights!
full banner - advertise here .50¢/1000 views
click here for Rodent Pro
pool banner - $50 year

RE: another try: Sibling species...

[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] [ Reply To This Message ]
[ Register to Post ]

Posted by: aspidoscelis at Thu Sep 1 13:08:48 2005  [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by aspidoscelis ]  
   


"Depends a bit on where you look for differentiation. Whereas allopatric populations may not beocme differentiated morphologically if selection pressures stay the same, they will become differentiated at the molecular level, given enough time. The question is whether we should only acknowledge this once differentiation affects morphology, or whether consistent molecular differences (e.g., separate mtDNA haplotype clades) are enough."

Well, I figure any species concept has to be evolutionary (ironically, this is my main objection to the "evolutionary species concept" ) and therefore only differences that can reasonably be assumed to be evolutionarily important should be considered in species boundaries. This would mean, essentially, differential adaptation to environmental factors or sufficient differentiation in neutral genetic characters to preclude interbreeding.

That you have two mtDNA clades tells you that the two sets of organisms have been isolated in some form. It doesn't tell you anything about differential adaptation, and only at fairly high levels would it imply reproductive isolation. Basically, mtDNA clades tell you something about the past, but rarely say anything about the present or future. Burbrink's split of Pantherophis obsoletus provides a good example; he has nice mtDNA clades, but no evidence for differential adaptation and no evidence for current or future isolation of the clades.

"The reverse is of course also true - what do we do with allopatric populations that have undergone rapid morphological differentiation within a very short timespan, leaving them largely undifferentiated at the molecular level."

You call them separate species. Or subspecies if you're uncertain.

"Very often, what a taxonomist does will simply depend on the marker he happens to use or favour, or on what evidence is available. Hence the diversity of opinions among taxonomists."

True enough.

My feeling at this point, though, is that molecular data are excellent for phylogenies, but cannot, of themselves, tell us much of anything about taxon boundaries.

Patrick Alexander


   

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]


>> Next topic:  Graeme Gow has Died - richardwells, Tue Aug 16 06:06:41 2005
<< Previous topic:  Plestiodon or Eumeces? - HaroldD, Fri Jun 10 20:20:44 2005