that the Kahl animal is a "t-"--we don't really know anything!!

I think that was just the default assumption when the first Kahl animals were found-four babies from Colombia I believe--they just seemed to be what was accepted as a "red-eyed albino"--remember back then we had no idea about any caramel looking snake or variation from the "classic" albino "look." It has stuck ever since, but no test has ever been done on them.

[ Hide Replies ]

• Re my question way way below if - Tracy Barker, Sun Sep 24 09:01:39 2006
• Tracy, did Dave... - ChrisGilbert, Sun Sep 24 11:45:14 2006
• Why not............ - vcaruso15, Sun Sep 24 12:18:09 2006
• I just don't think so, lol... - ChrisGilbert, Sun Sep 24 12:20:22 2006
• RE: I think so! - ghackney, Sun Sep 24 18:40:08 2006
• RE: Tracy, did Dave... - Tracy Barker, Sun Sep 24 14:29:33 2006
• Ok, thanks for the info... - ChrisGilbert, Sun Sep 24 14:32:41 2006
• Tracy, I believe - giantkeeper, Sun Sep 24 11:57:32 2006
• RE: Tracy, I believe - Tracy Barker, Sun Sep 24 14:26:40 2006
• Tracy, I know that... - ChrisGilbert, Sun Sep 24 19:13:45 2006
• RE: Re my question way way below if - PanamaRed, Sun Sep 24 15:58:53 2006
• RE: Gotta love boas! - Gerryssscales, Sun Sep 24 17:36:09 2006
• RE: Re my question way way below if - Paul Hollander, Sun Sep 24 18:36:45 2006
• RE: You are correct, we don't even know - Tracy Barker, Sun Sep 24 19:36:01 2006
• Tracy - styrsnake, Mon Sep 25 13:04:46 2006
• RE: Thanks Steve, I just saw this! I'm - Tracy Barker, Tue Sep 26 01:34:45 2006