i call them that here for the sake of conversation when in rome type thang, now weve met, you know whats i calls um in person... thams kangsnakes there.

breedings i do here are for my enjoyment and to personally see and actually confirm my theory that they are all the same snake and it hurts when puritans wanna say crossing getula ssp. is creating mutts, its the damn splitters/purist that create this division. ive worked with getula here in tx. for 30yrs i think i know and understand them in the past 15yrs ive dabbled with ALL the recognized ssp. of getula and my opinion is they are all the same snake and many if not most in hobby are indeed crossed backbred, linebred, inbred, morphs to produce pretty. what i cant stand is for the puritan to market his/her offspring as PURE when they dont know! and its done/accepted ALL the time. now this guys yellow speck yes very nice very pretty but is it acceptable to market it as "pure" holbrooki"?or pure splendida? the ww's have history as to their

"purity" as do some other morphs and lines. personally ive always thought the amel holbrooki/splendy was a creation. true morphs will have accurate history on the line. pop-ups like this imho cannot be considered a "new morph" so much as a created morph bit of a differance there. ,,,,,,,,thomas
-----
Morphs... just like baseball cards BUT ALIVE, how cool is that???



my website www.barmollysplace.com

[ Show Entire Thread ]