On topic, exactly what kind of research are you doing there Dr. Mendala? What techniques are you using? Any quantifiable data? Anything different than a 10 year old? What quantifiable data are you basing your judgement on the numbers of types(3) of kings? Have you bothered to read anyone else's ideas on the subject? With whose research do you most closely side? You see Thomas, these are questions necessary in the scientific method.



If you want to be as important as you think you are in the community you should understand that asking questions and developing answers communally is always more efficient. Two heads are always better than one, sort to speak. Refining ideas and methods in biology is continual, classification and reclassification is monotonous but necessary on a level you dont fully understand. Stop dancing your Texas 2 step and admit to your lack of method or post data we can mull over to consider your theories. Anecdotes? Every 10 year old has em,lol.

[ Show Entire Thread ]