![]() | market - home |
![]() |
|
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Kingsnake Forum ] |
Posted by: SDeFriez at Sat Jan 2 14:43:05 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by SDeFriez ] Very true bro, I agree with you 100%. For years I've known that yumensis is a californiae X splendida, just as nitida and cunjuncta are variations of californiae. Same with floridana and it's many variations. Be it a variation of a snake or of intergradation, a cool snake is a cool snake! Why can't taxonomists see it the way it is? [ Hide Replies ]
| ||
>> Next topic: Are There Fl Kings in Brevard co..Doug? - ChristopherD, Sat Jan 2 16:33:53 2010 << Previous topic: Most anticipated project for 2010.....? - JKruse, Fri Jan 1 02:58:46 2010 | ||
|
|
|
|