![]() | market - home |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Kingsnake Forum ] |
Posted by: Jeff Schofield at Sat Mar 13 01:44:31 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Jeff Schofield ] that describe in better detail the way a species LOOKS! Doug, I simply dont find it necessary to say that this line is 92.45837% Eastern king! The truth is a WC NJ chain king...cant be PROVEN to be 100% chain king!You cant breed it with a cal king and say its 50-50 because you dont know the actual genetic makeup of the original animals, you only know what they LOOK LIKE. You do realize that subspecies themselves are simply a more specific NAME for a LOOK of a species right? You are arguing against the % of subspecific integration. There is NO SUCH THING as a "pure" ssp. because its definition is arbitrary to begin with. Otherwise you could argue which is more "pure" a NJ or a NC king! Its MOOT, and you should know that! | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: No, there are none - DMong, Wed Mar 10 12:24:53 2010 | ||
|
|
|
|