![]() | market - home |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Kingsnake Forum ] |
Posted by: Jeff Schofield at Sat Mar 13 12:08:09 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Jeff Schofield ] Dougi, dont cal kings and mex blacks intergrade in the wild in places? Once again your example failed to show me a example of what you consider a misrepresented animal. Offspring from such a breeding, if rebred to either "pure"ssp., would be MINIMALLY 75% "pure" right? One more generation and its 88%, another 94%. So 3 generations from this "bastardization" the babies would again be 94% "pure" and may "look" like what you want. I suggest that getting better than 94% purity is ideal, but not always necessary to get the "look" that most breeders go for. | ||
>> Next Message: RE: Its not all about Doug, LMAO - DMong, Sat Mar 13 18:10:50 2010 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: Its not all about Doug, LMAO - DMong, Sat Mar 13 11:32:43 2010 | ||
|
|
|
|