mobile - desktop |
Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Kingsnake Forum ] |
Posted by: Jeff Schofield at Fri Jun 11 22:26:07 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Jeff Schofield ] My point, in agreeing with FR, is that ANY selective breeding reduces locality. Especially morph breeding. Selective inbreeding 10 generations(F10)without new blood creates a manmade reflection on what the genes might have looked like 30 years ago. But not likely. Is that the definition of "locality"?? I think most "locality" breeders would like to incorporate new blood, I want to think they do. If they want to seriously differentiate themselves a standard might help? Otherwise we can end up with 10-15 DIFFERENT versions on the same locality.....and what good does that do anyone? | ||
>> Next Message: RE: We might actually agree!! - FR, Sat Jun 12 09:27:52 2010 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: We might actually agree!! - a153fish, Fri Jun 11 17:23:49 2010 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|