mobile - desktop |
Available Now at RodentPro.com! |
News & Events:
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Kingsnake Forum ] |
Posted by: jeff schofield at Sat Jun 12 11:18:46 2010 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by jeff schofield ] Their DNA does NOT change. Their DNA doesnt change them over time. If milks have a range from 1-1000, eastern milks from 1-50, this locale will have a range like 1-10, and all snakes should fall within that range. The arent chameleons, they dont have those type of pigment cells to change color. But you are right when it comes to your "mirror" analogy. Just because type 1 pattern is more prevalent atop the hill and type 2 at the bottom does NOT mean a thing, maybe YOU find that type easier in those places. These snakes have been around a long time, longer than that hill, its survivorship in these places that define most people's ideal of "locale". If you bred type 1 x type 1 I'd still be that somewhere along the line that a type 2 would show up simply due to variation. With bicolor kings we dont see as much as we do in tricolors. | ||
>> Next Message: RE: They are WITHIN a range, not have a rang - Dobry, Tue Jun 15 11:51:00 2010 | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: Natural and manmade examples - Upscale, Sat Jun 12 10:44:10 2010 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|