Man that is one funny way to approach this, What the heck do you know about what I have seen or observed.



You take one small tiny example and try to make up the whole behavior, man thats one silly naive way to discuss this.



If you wanted to take this discussion somewhere, you would, ask more appropriate quesitons, like what occurs before the group under AC. If you actually would question that, I would say, my work does not include AC. Its all done under natural conditions.



The answer would be, I/we followed neonates from birth or hathching to adulthood. In some cases over thirty years with the same individual. Have done this with many species including kings.



Do I know everything, oh heck no, but we have duplicated what we saw in nature, in captivity. And I/we have seen a lot.



We do know where they go and what kind of groups they are in, What we don't know is exactly how they do this.





What bothers me is, why do you make it an arguement between people and not about the animals. To make it about the animals, we should discuss this, but you do not want that, as you know your wrong. Heck if I know everything, but they are surely more then a snake in a plasitc box, kept in solitary confinment. Do you think otherwise???????? is that what you think they are? then you may want to ask why do you want to think that.

[ Show Entire Thread ]