I have already stated many times, what Bluerosy does is within the genetic potential of his animals. So its as right as any other positive result.

Again, we judge reproductive levels by the numbers produced and the health and continued health of the animals envolved.

So if his animals produce more healthier babies and do so for several years or a lot of years, then Bluerosys results are BETTER then those LESS then his. And it has nothing to do with bluerosy.

In nature, those that recruit the most successfully WIN, they are the genetics that continue the species or population. Not the ones that DO NOT.

What your thinking is not about animals, biology or snakes. It appears your stuck with your own misundertandings about snakes and your blaming Bluerosy for his success that you cannot achieve. Thats what it appears like to me. Why not take rainiers name out of it and continue or redo this discussion. If you did that, there would be no discussion.

In a friggin nutshell, one average clutch a year is normal, more is superior, less is inferior to normal. That is simple enough. Of course the females must remain healthy and by all indications, Rainiers snakes are super healthy, hahahahahahaha which is why they have super reproductive results.

[ Show Entire Thread ]