Hi Kerby,

From your vast experience, and you do have that. It would line up with your second clutches wouldn't it. I am just saying.

What gets me is, why do folks automatically go against logic and evidence? There is more reason to call it a second clutch, from WHAT WE KNOW, then a late first clutch, based on what we do not know. Funny thought huh?

And if you look at that female, shes a bit thin, like it is her second clutch.

If you want to debate what it is, the entire lack of evidence that points to being a first clutch, vs. repeated events in captivity that match up very well with her timing and weight. Fun stuff hey. As an ex cop, you should be very good at this. No enough to convict, but enough to investigate further.

And don't feel picked on, when I see this in the field I ask that of the other biologists I am with. I ask them why not, they have no answer either. Thanks

[ Show Entire Thread ]