I do not know what it is, but the timing and condition of the animals indicates it could be a second clutch.

Because its without history, we will never know.

If we go back to the start, several stated its the first. Then backtracked and said it could be the second.

Whats odd is, it could be the second also means it could be the first. So you do not need to say, its the first or most likely the first, etc. Simply stating, that it very well could be the second, based on timing and condition, that also implies that it still could be the first.

As I stated, there is no evidence that it is the first. And merely timing and condition that its the second. Which cannot prove anything.

What is odd to me is, observation is not about exact or proof, observation, is merely observation, us guessing at what an animal is doing.

Repeated observations are what lead to facts. Or other observations that are tied/connected to the original observation.

[ Show Entire Thread ]