Posted by:
rtdunham
at Fri Oct 28 16:57:55 2011 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by rtdunham ]
...just curious as to how they were named axanthic when there are normal (non axanthic) white banded California kings already that are not considered axanthic.
why should the black-and-white "normal" cal kings not be considered axanthic? I think sometimes we fail to consider what's obvious.
Marshall McLuhan said whoever it was discovered water, you can bet it wasn't a fish.
[ Hide Replies ]
- Florida introduced species - Bluerosy, Fri Oct 28 10:16:10 2011
- RE: Florida introduced species - a153fish, Fri Oct 28 10:44:15 2011
- RE: Florida introduced species - Jlassiter, Fri Oct 28 11:01:05 2011
- RE: Florida introduced species - GerardS, Fri Oct 28 11:27:14 2011
- RE: Florida introduced species - Bluerosy, Fri Oct 28 11:38:03 2011
- RE: Florida introduced species - Jlassiter, Fri Oct 28 12:30:58 2011
- RE: Florida introduced species - GerardS, Fri Oct 28 12:33:10 2011
- RE: Florida introduced species - Bluerosy, Fri Oct 28 12:53:56 2011
- RE: Florida introduced species - GerardS, Fri Oct 28 13:02:10 2011
- RE: Florida introduced species - Jlassiter, Fri Oct 28 13:44:02 2011
- So , - GerardS, Fri Oct 28 13:53:57 2011
- RE: So , - Jlassiter, Fri Oct 28 14:56:39 2011
- RE: So , - Jlassiter, Fri Oct 28 14:58:57 2011
- RE: So , - GerardS, Fri Oct 28 15:05:31 2011
- RE: So , - Jlassiter, Fri Oct 28 15:19:29 2011
- RE: Florida introduced species - Jlassiter, Fri Oct 28 13:49:57 2011
- too funny...just saying............. - Kerby..., Fri Oct 28 18:13:34 2011
- RE: Florida introduced species - varanid, Fri Oct 28 17:33:31 2011
- RE: Florida introduced species - charleshanklin, Sun Oct 30 15:08:34 2011
|