Posted by:
Jlassiter
at Thu Jan 19 20:14:41 2012 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Jlassiter ]
>>Just so you won't think I'm crazy I've thought up a hypothetical scenario:
>>
>>A population of timber rattlers is comprised of individual which rattle and individuals which don't rattle, or rarely rattle. As people engage in various activities in the area they encounter a snake rattling up a storm....they immediately kill it. The individuals who don't rattle are often unnoticed and have a much higher chance of reproducing. As time progresses the population begins to have more and more individuals who don't rattle.
>>
>>Granted this is a hypothetical scenario.
>>Rattling or not would seem to be an inherited genetic trait resulting in a visually observable characteristic. Phenotype?
>>What do you think?
Possibly.....Kinda like the thought of line breeding for hardy feeders....Feeding is a visual act, but it isn't expressed all the time....nor is rattling or not rattling....Typically they don't rattle unless threatened...If a tree falls in the forest does anyone hear it?.......It is certainly in their genetic makeup but I still don't think it's a phenotypical expression.......
-----
John Lassiter
Poor planning and procrastination on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part...
[ Hide Replies ]
|
RE: Morph question - Jlassiter, Thu Jan 19 20:14:41 2012