![]() | mobile - desktop |
![]() |
|
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Kingsnake Forum ] |
Posted by: RossPadilla at Fri Jul 20 12:01:44 2012 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by RossPadilla ] The problem with that, is there is a huge difference in looks between a king that is 50/50 on the very top, to a king with thinner white bands on the top, but makes it up on the lower sides. If we counted the sides, then tons of kings could be considered 50/50. Why even use the term anymore if it doesn't distinguish between a thin white banded on top from a wide white banded on top? I'm not directing that question to anyone, just making a point with it. | ||
>> Next Message: RE: 50/50 Agree to Disagree - DMong, Fri Jul 20 12:51:25 2012 | ||
<< Previous Message: 50/50 Agree to Disagree - KingDome, Fri Jul 20 09:32:25 2012 | ||
|
|
|
|