Posted by:
Jlassiter
at Mon Oct 8 13:31:39 2012 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Jlassiter ]
>>John,
>>
>>The pied gene in the heterozygous form (it is recessive) seems to show itself more and more as it is combined with more codom genes. Plain hets do have markers, pastel hets can be even more obvious, Pewter hets even more so, so on so on.
>>
>>NERD considers it to be similar to its own trait when it is combined with the right genes, weird how it shows itself better with some morphs than others.
>>
>>Hope that made some sense!
Not really...lol
There are different degrees of piebald.....
If it's showing some degree isn't it pied?
Unless those are LARGE "Ringer" markings???????
But I understand what you are describing.
We see it with some california kings.
Kerby has produced Hypo looking California kings. They are multi hets, but not het for hypo..... ----- John Lassiter
Poor planning and procrastination on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part...

[ Hide Replies ]
- O/TWhat is your favorite non-king morph? - bluerosy, Sun Oct 7 19:00:52 2012
- RE: O/TWhat is your favorite non-king morph? - Jlassiter, Sun Oct 7 20:45:58 2012
- RE: O/TWhat is your favorite non-king morph? - Jlassiter, Mon Oct 8 01:05:55 2012
- RE: O/TWhat is your favorite non-king morph? - rtdunham, Mon Oct 8 10:52:57 2012
- Good post! - GerardS, Mon Oct 8 11:27:12 2012
- THESE - CBI, Mon Oct 8 12:37:46 2012
- RE: THESE - Bluerosy, Mon Oct 8 13:05:12 2012
- RE: THESE - GerardS, Mon Oct 8 13:12:26 2012
- RE: THESE - Jlassiter, Mon Oct 8 13:33:04 2012
- RE: THESE - GerardS, Mon Oct 8 13:07:29 2012
- RE: THESE - corporateprey, Mon Nov 5 23:34:58 2012
- Oh yeah! - GerardS, Mon Oct 8 13:10:38 2012
- RE: O/TWhat is your favorite non-king morph? - KcTrader, Mon Oct 8 13:21:05 2012
- And these - KcTrader, Mon Oct 8 13:22:08 2012
- RE: I think mine is... - mikefedzen, Tue Oct 9 05:07:09 2012
|