![]() | market - home |
![]() |
![]() |
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Kingsnake Forum ] |
Posted by: chrish at Fri Dec 19 15:49:28 2003 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by chrish ] it was somehow the Pet Store's responsibility to protect the child from "wild" animals, not the snake owner nor his mother, who was also there. I guess she is allowed to be irresponsible, but not the store owner. | ||
>> Next Message: lol- ditto -NP - DJW, Fri Dec 19 17:19:06 2003 >> Next Message: RE: It is interesting that.... - MartinWhalin1, Fri Dec 19 23:39:23 2003 >> Next Message: One point... - foxturtle, Sat Dec 20 08:10:40 2003 >> Next Message: RE: It is interesting that.... - Bianca, Mon Dec 29 01:54:21 2003 | ||
<< Previous Message: Uncle Bills faces lawsuit after python attacks boy -msg - koashmar, Fri Dec 19 14:27:47 2003 | ||
|
|
|
|