Posted by:
viandy
at Sat Apr 9 13:57:38 2005 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by viandy ]
I had always wondered why breeding was necessary to "prove out" a super salmon or a dominant hypo, and why the appearance didn't reflect the "super" trait. But I was just accepting that it was codominant, as with pastel jungle ball pythons or tiger reticulateds. As a friend says, "the obvious has now become apparent". Thanks!
[ Hide Replies ]
- Who was it that decided that hypomelanism was co-dominant? - Sojourn, Sat Apr 9 11:11:53 2005
- You are completely right. - Randall_Turner, Sat Apr 9 12:35:14 2005
- Hi Randy.... - Sojourn, Sat Apr 9 13:09:17 2005
- Nope.. - Randall_Turner, Sat Apr 9 14:20:13 2005
- RE: Who was it that decided that hypomelanism was co-dominant? - ChrisGilbert, Sat Apr 9 13:26:15 2005
 GREat thread!! It certainly explained some things to me. - viandy, Sat Apr 9 13:57:38 2005
- It may be useful to check how Rich explained it...... - gray, Sat Apr 9 14:27:42 2005
- Bingo! - Rainshadow, Sat Apr 9 14:31:12 2005
- RE: Who was it that decided that hypomelanism was co-dominant? - graciascott, Sat Apr 9 14:34:31 2005
- I have tried to tackle this one before, but ... - creptilia, Sat Apr 9 19:03:37 2005
- I must admit my ignorence (and I don't spell good either) - SteveM, Sat Apr 9 22:00:58 2005
|
