Posted by:
ChrisGilbert
at Sat Apr 9 19:40:38 2005 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by ChrisGilbert ]
Essentially the transfer of genes is the same in hypos as in Tiger retics. Simply put, the homozygous is just not visually different. Think of co-doms and in this case non homozygous hypos to be the heterozygous, the supers are the homozygous. It is analogous to recessive traits, except that in this instance you know which are at least hets and which are normal.
[ Hide Replies ]
- Who was it that decided that hypomelanism was co-dominant? - Sojourn, Sat Apr 9 11:11:53 2005
- You are completely right. - Randall_Turner, Sat Apr 9 12:35:14 2005
- Hi Randy.... - Sojourn, Sat Apr 9 13:09:17 2005
- Nope.. - Randall_Turner, Sat Apr 9 14:20:13 2005
- RE: Who was it that decided that hypomelanism was co-dominant? - ChrisGilbert, Sat Apr 9 13:26:15 2005
- It may be useful to check how Rich explained it...... - gray, Sat Apr 9 14:27:42 2005
- Bingo! - Rainshadow, Sat Apr 9 14:31:12 2005
- RE: Who was it that decided that hypomelanism was co-dominant? - graciascott, Sat Apr 9 14:34:31 2005
- I have tried to tackle this one before, but ... - creptilia, Sat Apr 9 19:03:37 2005
- I must admit my ignorence (and I don't spell good either) - SteveM, Sat Apr 9 22:00:58 2005
|
RE: GREat thread!! It certainly explained some things to me. - ChrisGilbert, Sat Apr 9 19:40:38 2005