![]() | mobile - desktop |
![]() |
|
News & Events:
|
| [ Login ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Kingsnake Forum ] |
Posted by: Aaron at Sat Sep 17 19:12:25 2005 [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by Aaron ] I did call the Merker's hypo, which are the ones I have. I asked him if they were simple recessive and he said yes. Now I am not so sure after seeing the posts Erik Loza put up on them a few months ago and for the reasons I stated above, it is hard to tell with a snake that has a natural brown phase. I also posted a long time ago a wc king I had that I thought was hypo and asked opinions on. I refered to that one as a possible unproven hypo which is what I would think all of the unproven suspected hypos should be refered to as. That is all I meant. | ||
<< Previous Message: The difference being in proof......... - Kerby..., Sat Sep 17 17:55:09 2005 | ||
|
|
|
|