Please try and think about this, its very important.



I reported an observation. Thats it, period. The observation is real. Then you go on and on, about what you think, sir, to think without evidence is assumption. You assumed you know where I was. But you have no proof that of that. So that is an assumption.



In fact, you were not there, so all your thoughts are assumptions. Lastly, you go on and on, and on. All over an observation.



Sir, you cannot argue with an observation. It is what it is. To prove an observation valid, your must repeat it. We have many times over in this case. There is no more to it, at this time.



What that means is, your assumptions are just that, your assumptions, and they have no bearing on the observation, you were not part of it. Also what you think is of no importance. Sorry to say, specially because your so willing to go on assumption. Please think about that.



Remember, you are allowed to think whatever you like. But your thinking does not effect an observation or what these snakes are actually doing. Thanks and please consider this, FR

[ Show Entire Thread ]