Previously, when I suggested the Burms might not be injurious, Mike Rochford had quite a reaction to that comment. Seemed to demonstrate a predisposition to conclusions not yet proven.
Innocent until proven guilty...contempt prior to investigation is the sign of a closed mind.
I'm not exactly sure of his position, but isn't he a biologist studying the situation? Doesn't that call his unbiased credibility into question?
jsc
-----
"As hard as I've tried, just can't NOT do this"
John Crickmer