No, Joe. I just said that Merker’s photo listed under his Sanderson chapter "apparently escaped through the radar” in the editing process. And I wasn’t being smart-alecky. I’m not arguing that these are 9-mile. But I’m only sharing the reason why I was previously led to believe they were (i.e. they were listed as locality-specific in a book).

This has nothing to do with my research at all. I’ve already given you four reasons why I’m not using Ric’s alterna in the research.