mobile - desktop |
3 months for $50.00 |
News & Events:
|
|
[ Login ] [ User Prefs ]
[ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ] [ Back to Taxonomy Discussion ] [ Reply To This Message ] [ Register to Post ] |
Posted by: CKing at Sat Apr 19 21:28:44 2008 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by CKing ] >>If dwarfism is indeed ancestral, then the two allopatric populations to the north almost certainly evolved their large body sizes independently of each other and therefore they should not be lumped together as a single subspecies because of morphological similarities that are likely convergent. [ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Show Entire Thread ] | ||
<< Previous Message: RE: C. bottae taxonomy - CKing, Sat Apr 19 00:38:29 2008 |
AprilFirstBioEngineering | GunHobbyist.com | GunShowGuide.com | GunShows.mobi | GunBusinessGuide.com | club kingsnake | live stage magazine
|