You "argue" like a Creationist feebly attempting to shoot down the theory of evolution. You illogically nitpick at peripheral irrelevancies, while at the same time providing little to nothing to support your claims, and you BLATANTLY avoid answering pointed questions about your claims



YOU said: "If there are 'only' tens of thousands of feral pythons out there right now, then they should be much easier to control

than either hogs or cats. It seems sensible to me to fight the problem BEFORE it has the chance to get as bad as the

other species."



I'll put that in capital letters now so you don't miss it:

"THEY SHOULD BE MUCH EASIER TO CONTROL THAN EITHER HOGS OR CATS."

"...FIGHT THE PROBLEM..."



Now address my questions/requests or retract you statements. Here are the questions/requests once more:



1) Regarding "controlling" the burms, please explain how any of the proposed legislation will have any effect on the burms

in the Everglades?



2) Please explain HOW they will be "controlled" with or without any laws.



3)Please explain why you even believe we humans can "control" the burm population. We don't exactly have a good track record of controlling, much less eradicating,

any species.



4) Actually, maybe you can define the "problem" first. Show some proof that the burms have an overall negative effect on the

Everglades ecosystem. So far you have provided a citation, and that was a report the concluded HUMANS were the cause of the decline of the wood rat.

[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]