Posted by:
amazondoc
at Fri Feb 19 20:26:15 2010 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email Message ] [ Show All Posts by amazondoc ]
Surprisingly enough, I don't have a major argument with your statement.
I've been pondering the idea of bounties, and the big problem I can see off the bat is that John Q. Idjit is likely to start killing EVERY snake they see -- just in case it MIGHT be one of them pythons that they can git paid for. I'm not sure what would be a good way to get around that.
As for a bounty on cats and dogs, I think in a practical sense -- the good of the Everglades -- it might be a good thing. But, realistically speaking, you would NEVER get it passed because of all the legal, political, and emotional barriers involved. OTOH, I suppose it *might* be possible to get a "bounty" passed that pays for live-trapped dogs/cats rather than killed ones. Dunno!
Just some thoughts! ----- ----
0.1 Peruvian rainbow boa (Amaru) 2.0 Brazilian rainbow boas (TBA) 0.3 Honduran milksnakes (Chicchan, Chanir, Hari) 1.0 Thayeri kingsnake (TBA) 2.7 corns (Cetto, Tolosa, TBA) 1,000,000.1,000,000 other critters
[ Reply To This Message ] [ Subscribe to this Thread ] [ Hide Replies ]
|